RSS Feed

Category Archives: New website

SoLoCo to pioneer fundraising approach used by Obama in the UK

I came across SoloCo during Social Media Week Scotland and was immediatlely intrigued.

I remember when the Obama campaign was in full swing and I was working in my first charity job (many years ago) as Assistant Web Producer and my then CEO  asked how could we fundraise like Obama did.

Not easily I remember thinking.

But that may change, SoLoCo is in Beta and is already looking pretty slick. At the moment it is Scottish based and there are 11 projects bidding for funding, including:

  • A Radio project
  • A youth Football project
  • And SoLoCo itself who are seeking funding to support the site for the next stage of development.

But in the current climate for charities with reduced incomes it could be one to watch.

So what do you think of the crowd funding model? Is SoLoCo the future for community and smaller projects? Will other charities follow (CRUK are already doing something similar with MyProjects)?

Be great to hear your views.

Data driven decisions on Facebook

Posted on
Image representing Facebook as depicted in Cru...

Image via CrunchBase

UPDATE: October 2011

Seems that with the new Facebook Insights that you can now export all the data that you need to make the below work again without using Export.ly. Plus there are some new metrics too, individual users who have seen each post as well as reach.

Good times!

 

UPDATE:

Export.ly seem to have been taken over by Simply Measured and don’t seem to offer the same, very cost effective, solution as what we did below.  Hoping to find out more, but as you can imagine, I’m very keen to keep using them!

I was having a chat with a colleague last week and she asked me why we update our Facebook page twice a day and how do we make that decision? Was it just a guess or a hunch?

The answer to both was by using data.

At the BHF we have a very healthy Facebook community with lots of engagement, take a look – I am very proud of it. We have worked very hard to make sure that we are talking to our ‘likers’ every day and engaging them in conversation not just broadcasting at them, using our top class content to build better relationships.

But how did we make decisions about when we should post a Facebook update?

In April, we used Export.ly to export the previous 12 months Facebook data to a huge Excel file.

Our Analytics Executive Dan manipulated the Excel file and in a few hours we knew:

  • Time of our updates
  • Amount of likes per post
  • Amount of comments per post
  • Whether posts included a video, photo or if they were just a text update
  • Our top contributors to our page
  • Lots more treasures…

Now we had all that data we could cross reference the time of our updates by comments and likes and find out when updates had higher levels engagement – allowing us to make decisions on when we post using data rather than just a hunch.

We are due another data mine soon and due to the substantial increase in ‘likes’ that we have had since April I think that our timings may change slightly. I’m keen to find out whether our updates with a question are more engaging with our ‘likers’ than one’s without  too as well as some more extensive work into what topics get more engagement (if you’re reading this Dan then that’s what I’m going to ask next week..).

For the record, our highest engagement came between 11:30-13:00 and 18:30-19:30…

N.B We had to pay $50 dollars for our Export.ly file due to the size of our Facebook page, but if you’re managing a page with less ‘likes’ then you may not have to pay at all. (We have 100,000+ likes now).

“Gamification” best presentation I’ve seen on the topic

Posted on

How we are building the British Heart Foundation community

Posted on

BHF community teamI’ve been involved in online communities since I can remember, having grown up with an Ollivetti PC with AOL dial up; forums, messageboards and chat rooms were all we had until MSN really kicked off. Building an online community at the British Heart Foundation has been a huge challenge; the community ”soft” launched today, please do visit the site and tell anyone you know that is interested in the BHF.

Here is my  (rather long) experience…It would be great to hear your thoughts!

For as long as anyone can remember our supporters have been asking for a space online where they could meet other people and share experiences. That might be talking to others about their heart condition, or talking to a group of people who are trekking to China to raise vital funds for our work.

Two years ago we began a global navigation review of our website. This was a nine month project looking into our website, how people used the site and how they wanted to.

We ran lots of focus groups with every person imaginable; teachers, current users of our site, doctors, professors, people who take part in events and even people who hated going online and found out what made them tick and what they wanted or didn’t want from our website.

We put our users at the heart (excuse the pun) of our website and it paid off hugely. We now have a fantastic website that was developed in partnership with our audience with innovative features like our patient pathway (the strap across the front page from Prevention to recovery).

People wanted to connect

The feedback from the review told us in no uncertain terms that our supporters wanted to connect with people in similar situations. Similar sentiments were coming in from all areas; focus groups with our Health at Work practitioners were telling us they wanted to talk about delivering Health at Work with other practitioners online. Our eventers wanted to share tips and meet others going on treks or taking part in marathons online. Our Facebook audience was increasing at a phenomenal rate (from 20,000 12 months ago to 98,500 today) and they wanted to share their stories and how they were feeling and we wanted to build these relationships between our supporters and with us. People were even going away and starting their own forums but without the infrastructure or man power to deliver. We knew we had to step in.

A year ago we started in earnest to look at what a BHF online community would look like and how that would work for us. Like many large charities we have a lot of audiences and we also have a lot of data which we wanted to make sure was connected. Someone told me (outside of the BHF) that if they wouldn’t start an online community in a charity today because it is a data and registration nightmare!

How do you solve a problem like “Single Sign On”?

We didn’t want the community to be an add on or a second thought, but rather a hub of conversation about people’s experiences and what people were doing so that people could build relationships with each other and with us.

The biggest beast to tame was “Single Sign On”. Because our community is a different platform to our main website and hosted elsewhere we wanted to make sure that if you were a member of any of our online environments that you could use 1 login and you could use them all and for that solution to be scalable for any other online space we may add in future. Trust me when I say that this was a huge project but one I was lucky to be managing.

The people and the platform

We decided to talk to 8 agencies that had experience in building communities. We knew we wanted a community for all, not just for an event or for delivering health advice. We wanted a community that was for the whole BHF and we wanted our users to be able to seamlessly be able to engage and use their existing membership with us.

We decided to pick SIFT Groups. They work on the Drupal platform which is open source and have experience in charity working. It seemed like a great fit, they also brought a vast amount of experience in community management and training. We were all especially impressed with Elena Goodrum – a community manager and how she trained and spoke so passionately about community.

We already had buy in from the very, very top, we knew our supporters were chomping at the bit and we had our platform. The next step was to work very closely with SIFT to make the user journey as simple as possible, using all the information we have from the past two years we stripped back the community as much as physically possible. Do we need this? Do we need that? Can we ask our users about this bit? We questioned everything. But when we got to UAT and live site, it was all worth it.

At the same time “Single Sign On” was ongoing as a separate project. We were working both with SIFT and our web development agency Positive Technology to make sure that we could build a “passport” for users who sign up to the BHF website (to register for events, order publications and our Heart Matters service) so that they wouldn’t have to login to a new website, this had to work and was a critical part of the tech side of the project. We also had to make sure if a supporter signed up to the community they could sign up to all the other great things our website offers. All on another online environment. Tricky stuff! But we got there, and I won’t bore you about the tech side. Feel free to ask me any questions though!

But back to the people… (The best bit).

We had been working with our staff from the get go. Now we started working with the whole organisation on the community. We trained up 20 Heart Health nurses on how to use communities, how to moderate and how to engage online. We then trained our events staff so that they could help in the community management of the site. We got our customer service teams involved, how to moderate, how to engage, tone of voice. Luckily we had social media guidelines done and dusted and we also had a tone of voice guide, so this was a bit easier than it may have been elsewhere. How useful they proved to be!

We then started recruiting champions outside of the organisation. We used our social networking channels, we used our emails lists and anyone who had shown an interest in the BHF and doing more. We then invited them in to meet us, and gave them a sneak preview of the community. It was difficult, but it was so worth it when they saw it, we speak to the regularly, updated them about progress. We just kept them up to date and they loved being part of something. Sounds so simple huh.

Only at the first step…

All through this process we had been tweaking and adding to our growth strategy. With the different types of audiences and the sheer number of people who we talk to on a regular basis we wanted to make sure we didn’t launch with a big bang only to whimper a week or month later. We decided to phase specific audiences on to our site at soft launch, we picked our heart health audiences and eventers will be sign posted to our site and then a gradual evolution both natural (them finding it on our site) and us prodding them via email. We have a plan from launch in June all the way through until November already and that is just phase one of our growth.

I am sure I have missed lots; it was a huge team effort with a lot of highs and a lot of lows. We have a lot in the pipeline and our site now is going to be very different in 12 months time. But it was a fantastic journey for me personally and one of the biggest projects of my career.

We have been on a hell of a journey already, and the first step only starts today.

P.S – if you’ve read to the bottom here – thank you!

The socialisation of brands

Posted on

Found this via @Wearesocial on Twitter, as ever a really interesting link. Best to print off or view in full screen, get a coffee and take five minutes.

What are your thoughts?

Study: Ages of social network users | Royal Pingdom

Posted on

Saw this today and it is abit of stat porn I think. Loads of graphs, always interesting and useful as a point of reference I think. 

Find the whole breakdown here: http://bit.ly/dpmzPT 

Warning, ALOT of graphs. 

This is my favourite: 

Age distribution on social network sites

Enjoy!

Magntize – really hot online business card

Posted on

http://robertokusabbi.magntize.com (obviously spelt with no “i”) was brought to my attention by the excellent Zee from the Next Web website (http://twitter.com/zee). The site is super easy to use and is a nice shop window for all the sites you use in one place – the perfect online business card.

 

You can go “pro” for $9 a month at the startup level and I think the free version is a great effort. The interface is super easy to set up and the standard templates are really great to look at.

 

Not much to it, but they do it well. I am a big fan – and its another piece of the social media landscape to put a RK flag in :)

 

I am also loving squarespace.com but not had a go at that yet.

 

Try it out – magntize is free and super easy!

The curious case of Matthew Robson

Posted on

The world, or rather the readers of the Guardian and Morgan Stanley, seems to have gone a little bit crazy over a boy called Matthew Robson.

If you don’t know the ins and outs visit the Guardian site or read the “study”.

Ok. So for those who know I thought I would talk about what this means for people who manage young peoples websites.

I think that the hysteria of comments from the Guardian readers overlooks a very important phrase in the article. Morgan Stanley employee says “It’s an interesting starting point for debate.” I agree. Let us be honest, its is a great PR story for Morgan Stanley – it’s a nice little anecdotal piece of work and the points he made were valid and honest.

But nothing we didn’t already know, well nothing anyone with half an interest in online and young people’s habits didn’t know.

What it might be is a great opportunity to build some virtual personas. Like with any age group or generation there are different types of audience. Matthew Robson is the first persona of (a very specific Morgan Stanley interning for god’s sake persona) his generation/age group.  Lets work on the other personas – maybe we can get a good segmentation of that generation (generally) and that would be of great use (especially as I plan to do that for the sites I mange).

So if anyone reads this, what persona’s can we work on next? We have Matthew Robson. Who is the next persona?

Good bye for now. Sorry about the lack of entries, turns out starting a great new job and moving flat’s leaves you with less time than one would imagine!

N.B – Just a quick note, I think its obvious from the report but TV is going to slowly evolve (die) in the way that it is scheduled and watched. But that might be the most obvious thing said on wordpress since Obvious McObviouson started blogging

I have a hunch

Posted on

Hi all – not posted in a day or two, slacking already – I can hear you already! 

Just going to have a quick tumblr type entry today – was invited to this new website called hunch today – it seems cool, not sure how to describe it but its in beta at the moment. I suppose it has social networking spin (as most sites HAVE to now right?) and it has a community feel. Apparently it helps you answer any question you want with the help of your followers (seen that before somewhere…) and the rest of the community. In many ways – from what I can gauge it is kind of like a searc engine for questions – dilemmas – bit like answers.com I guess? Make of it what you will!

I have one...

I have one...

 

This is the official what is hunch line: 

“Hunch is a decision-making tool that gets smarter the more you use it. After asking you 10 questions or less, Hunch will provide a concrete result for decisions of every kind.” 

More a more indepth look try the factsheet – not sure if you have to sign up but this is the informaton factsheet.

Does anyone remember using those quiz websites in the early 2000′s…? Kinda feels like that, has it got legs? Not sure, but it is fun – for how long I don’t know. 

If you want to check it out – let me know what you think – and say hi! 

www.hunch.com 

Oh and of course they are on twitter too – www.twitter.com/hunch 

In other news I start my new job tomorrow, scarycoolexciting – is a new word I have coined which pretty much puts it into context…

Look forward to hearing from you!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.